Atticus: Market Opportunity Analysis
As a co-founder of Atticus, I conducted an opportunity assessment to identify viable markets for an LLM legal tool, targeting tech startups. This case study outlines my approach, findings, and ultimate decision-making process.
Approach
  • Conducted 20+ interviews with tech founders and General Counsels (GCs)
  • Analyzed current solutions and their shortcomings
  • Identified and segmented potential customer profiles
  • Evaluated competitive landscape
  • Developed opportunity scoring system for legal categories
Comprehensive Opportunity Analysis
To systematically evaluate the landscape of legal needs for early-stage tech startups, I developed a comprehensive matrix analyzing 15 distinct legal categories. Each category was assessed across various company phases, from core operations to expansion, and scored based on opportunity size and pain level for our target customers.
Key Findings
My analysis revealed three primary opportunities
Industry-Specific Compliance
  • Highest demand in regulated industries (e.g., fintech, healthtech)
  • Pain points: Complexity of jurisdiction-specific regulations, high cost of specialized legal advice
  • Opportunity: Provide tailored, up-to-date compliance guidance across various jurisdictions
Commercial Agreements
  • Strong interest from growth-stage B2B SaaS companies
  • Pain points: Slow turnaround, lack of business context in legal advice from outside counsel, inefficient negotiation process
  • Opportunity: AI-powered solution to streamline process and provide market insights
Associate-level Counsel
  • Strong interest from seed-stage founders working with outside counsel
  • Pain points: High costs and slow turnaround time of traditional firms
  • Opportunity: Provide faster, more context-aware triage than outside counsel
Additional insights:
  • Basic agreement generation (e.g., ToS, privacy policies) showed low retention potential
  • Bootstrapped founders were identified as a poor fit due to higher cost sensitivity
Outcome
Despite identifying several promising opportunities, we ultimately decided not to pursue this market. The primary reasons were:
  1. Founder-Market Fit: We recognized that our team's background and expertise were not ideally aligned with the deep legal knowledge required to build a truly differentiated product in this space.
  1. Resource Intensity: Building a comprehensive legal tool for tech startups would require significant time and resources, potentially taking a year or more of development before launching an MVP.
Other Case Studies
As Product and Design Principal on a lean team, I held cross-functional responsibilities spanning product management, design, and analytics. This allowed me to drive strategy, craft the experience, and measure outcomes end to end.
As Fractional Head of Product, I created a prioritization system that aligned engineering resources with business impact, transforming how an early-stage AI startup approached product decisions.
As Head of Product and Design, I led the successful expansion into a new vertical by conducting user research, designing workflows, and launching in three months while achieving 98% customer retention.